Skip to Main Content
 

GAO Report Highlights Concerns Over Political Intelligence Disclosure

April 4, 2013

On April 4, 2013, the U.S. Government Accountability Office released its highly anticipated report on the so-called "political intelligence" industry.  The report was mandated by the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act (the "STOCK Act") enacted in early 2012.  Although the report briefly notes that new legislation requiring disclosure of political intelligence-gathering activities could enhance transparency and aid the SEC's enforcement of insider trading laws, the report extensively questions the value of such disclosure and details the significant interpretive, legal, and administrative challenges that such legislation would present (as we highlighted in a previous client alert). 

Notwithstanding these significant challenges, the GAO report has already generated additional calls for regulation of the political intelligence industry.  Senator Grassley (R-IA) and Representative Slaughter (D-NY) issued a joint statement earlier today promising to "re-introduce" legislation to require political intelligence professionals "to register and disclose" their activities to the public.  Senator Grassley sponsored a provision in the initial version of the STOCK Act, which overwhelmingly passed 96-3 in the U.S. Senate, that would have required "political intelligence consultants" to comply with most registration and reporting obligations imposed on lobbyists under the federal Lobbying Disclosure Act ("LDA").  The House ultimately rejected Senator Grassley's provision, and Congress instead directed the GAO to study the political intelligence industry and issue today's report. 

The forthcoming Grassley-Slaughter legislation will presumably again propose to require firms and individuals that gather political intelligence to register and report under the LDA.  As we previously noted, treating political intelligence consultants as "lobbyists" raises several issues.  It is unclear whether Senator Grassley and Representative Slaughter will address these concerns in their forthcoming legislation.

Report Highlights

The GAO interviewed political intelligence firms, law firms, legal experts, one media organization, trade associations, one financial services firm, several non-governmental citizen advocacy or protection organizations, one academic researcher, and several governmental entities.  Notable excerpts from the report include:

 

"The extent to which investment decisions are based on a single piece of political intelligence would be extremely difficult to measure."

   

"The prevalence of the sale of political intelligence is not known and is therefore difficult to quantify, as political intelligence information gathering and dissemination is often bundled with other information sources . . . ."

  "[C]onsensus among political intelligence firms does not exist regarding some terms used in the STOCK Act definition of political intelligence."
 

"[A]ll three interviewees with broad public policy expertise questioned whether requiring disclosure would be a matter of promoting transparency without a compelling public purpose and were not certain what specific problem disclosure would resolve."

 

"[A]ccording to SEC officials, disclosure could help them accomplish their mission. For example, SEC officials told us that disclosure of more information could allow enforcement staff to identify relationships or make connections between various individuals involved in an investigation of potential insider trading."

 

"[A]nother potential benefit cited by SEC officials was that disclosure could potentially lead to investor protections as the nature and timing of the flow of information between a government official, a political intelligence firm, and an investor is made public through disclosure. . . . However, for political intelligence it is uncertain how helpful disclosure would be to an investor given the pace of market movements."

The report also notes several "practical issues" that would need to be resolved in any legislation:

-

Clarifying "whether disclosure is required for the range of decisions that an investor can make including internal business decisions and a decision to do nothing";

-

Establishing who would administer and enforce registration and reporting requirements;

-

Identifying the "elements and characteristics" of disclosure;

-

Addressing concerns over the exposure of clients and clients' interests; the need for a media exception; and

-

Addressing First Amendment concerns, including the "chilling effect or slowing of communications between government, media, and political intelligence firms."

If you have any questions about this Alert, please contact a member of Caplin & Drysdale's Political Law Group.

Trevor Potter
202.862.5092
tpotter@capdale.com

Kirk L. Jowers
202.862.5057
kjowers@capdale.com

Joseph M. Birkenstock
202.862.7836
jbirkenstock@capdale.com

________________________________________________

About Caplin & Drysdale
Having celebrated our 50th Anniversary in 2014, Caplin & Drysdale continues to be a leading provider of tax, tax controversy, and litigation legal services to corporations, individuals, and nonprofits throughout the United States and around the world. We are also privileged to serve as legal advisors to accounting firms, financial institutions, law firms, and other professional services organizations.

The firm's reputation over the years has earned us the trust and respect of clients, industry peers, and government agencies. Moreover, clients rely on our broad knowledge of the law and our keen insights into their business concerns and personal interests. Our lawyers' strong tactical and problem-solving skills - combined with substantial experience handling a variety of complex, high stakes, matters in a boutique environment - make us one the nation's most distinctive law firms.

With offices in New York City and Washington, D.C., Caplin & Drysdale's core practice areas include:

-Bankruptcy
-Business, Investment & Transactional Tax
-Complex Litigation
-Corporate Law
-Employee Benefits
-Exempt Organizations
-International Tax
-Political Law
-Private Client
-Tax Controversies
-Tax Litigation
-White Collar Defense

For more information, please visit us at www.caplindrysdale.com.

Washington, DC Office:
One Thomas Circle, NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
202.862.5000
        New York, NY Office:
600 Lexington Avenue
21st Floor 
New York, NY 10022
212.379.6000

___________________________

Disclaimer
This communication does not provide legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship with you or any other reader. If you require legal guidance in any specific situation, you should engage a qualified lawyer for that purpose. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Attorney Advertising
It is possible that under the laws, rules, or regulations of certain jurisdictions, this may be construed as an advertisement or solicitation.

© 2017 Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered
All Rights Reserved.