Skip to Main Content

David Rosenbloom Comments on BEPS Action 2: The Hybrid Hydra

October 6, 2015, Tax Notes Today
Tax Notes Today summarizes and critiques the final action 2 report of the OECD  base erosion and profit-shifting (BEPS) with comments from H. David Rosenbloom during a discussion at Bocconi University's recent Global BEPS conference.  Also discussed were options for uniform interest deduction limitations for European countries such as, financial accounting and the worldwide debt/equity ratio.  For the complete article, please visit Tax Notes Today's website (subscription required).  To view previous coverage, please click on this link.
Excerpt taken from the article "BEPS Action 2: The Hybrid Hydra" by Lee A. Sheppard for Tax Notes Today.
Alternative Approaches
"I wonder if you would need this entire action item if you had appropriate limits on interest deductibility," said H. David Rosenbloom of Caplin & Drysdale Chtd. at the recent conference on BEPS at Bocconi University in Milan. (Prior analysis: Tax Notes, June 8, 2015, p. 1083 2015 TNT 109-3: News Stories.) Of course, multinationals can use rents and royalties for income stripping, but interest is the principal, easily manipulated tax planning tool that dovetails nicely with their cash management practices.
Here follows a list of simpler alternative approaches to anti-hybrid that would be good enough for the purpose:
Interest deduction denial. As Rosenbloom commented, interest deductions are the problem. The drafters should have taken advantage of the worldwide zero interest rate policy to eliminate or seriously restrict intragroup interest deductions. At this juncture, no multinational has any justification to be charging a borrower affiliate a high enough interest rate to strip out local earnings.
Ignore intragroup debt. A no-brainer. Generally accepted accounting principles ignore intragroup debt. International financial reporting standards, inexplicably, do not. As Rosenbloom noted, "intercompany debt does not exist." The final report recognized that payments between related companies are the problem. The report also recognizes that shareholder debt held proportionally to ownership is a problem, but doesn't recommend that every jurisdiction treat it as a contribution to capital.

About Caplin & Drysdale
Celebrating our 55th Anniversary in 2019, Caplin & Drysdale continues to be a leading provider of legal services to corporations, individuals, and nonprofits throughout the United States and around the world. We are also privileged to serve as legal advisors to accounting firms, financial institutions, law firms, and other professional services organizations.

The firm's reputation over the years has earned us the trust and respect of clients, industry peers, and government agencies. Moreover, clients rely on our broad knowledge of the law and our keen insights into their business concerns and personal interests. Our lawyers' strong tactical and problem-solving skills -- combined with substantial experience handling a variety of complex, high stakes, matters in a boutique environment -- make us one the nation's most distinctive law firms.

With offices in New York City and Washington, D.C., Caplin & Drysdale's core practice areas include:
For more information, please visit us at
Washington, DC Office:
One Thomas Circle NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
New York, NY Office:
600 Lexington Avenue
21st Floor
New York, NY 10022


This communication does not provide legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship with you or any other reader. If you require legal guidance in any specific situation, you should engage a qualified lawyer for that purpose. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Attorney Advertising
It is possible that under the laws, rules, or regulations of certain jurisdictions, this may be construed as an advertisement or solicitation.
©2021 Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered
All Rights Reserved.

Related Professionals

Related Practice Area(s)