Skip to Main Content

Law360 Quotes David Rosenbloom on TCJA and Inversions

April 16, 2018, Law360

Despite the business-friendly tone of the U.S. tax overhaul, specialists say the new law’s treatment of offshore earnings could still push some companies to move their headquarters overseas if they can make it over the rising hurdles against inversions.

. . .

David Rosenbloom, a professor at the New York University School of Law and a member of Caplin & Drysdale's Washington office, said that most inverters don’t actually leave the U.S., so there would still be a tax on U.S. operations.

“But you’d be out of Subpart F, and since you would be out of CFC status, you’d also be out of GILTI, so that’s a benefit,” he said.

While there are other motivations to move abroad, such as a rate that’s lower than 21 percent, the real benefit of inverting is to reduce the U.S. tax base, Rosenbloom said. He added that companies still could pull that off if they can get around the BEAT.

The BEAT, touted by the law's authors as a crucial protection against base-stripping by foreign companies, limits deductions on payments by a U.S. corporate entity to related parties abroad, ensuring it doesn't reduce its U.S. taxable income to less than 10 percent.

. . .

However, Rosenbloom pointed out that there are some companies that won’t be subject to the BEAT. For example, the provision only applies to corporations making more than $500 million or to transactions found to be “base erosion payments,” including rent, royalties and interest.

“If you can avoid the BEAT all together, I don’t see why you wouldn’t have an incentive to invert,” he said.

. . .

In the meantime, Rosenbloom said, although Congress passed a major tax overhaul, no one knows how long it will last or what will happen if the powers change on Capitol Hill.

“Looking at the rules as they stand, companies considering a big-ticket change like an inversion are going to be deterred by the fact that the situation is quite unclear,” he said, noting that inversions have affects over multiple years. “I think companies will not rush into something in such an uncertain situation.”

For the full article, please visit Law360’s website (subscription required).

Excerpt taken from the article “TCJA Limits Means For Inversions, But Incentives Remain” by Natalie Olivo for Law360.


About Caplin & Drysdale
Celebrating our 55th Anniversary in 2019, Caplin & Drysdale continues to be a leading provider of legal services to corporations, individuals, and nonprofits throughout the United States and around the world. We are also privileged to serve as legal advisors to accounting firms, financial institutions, law firms, and other professional services organizations.

The firm's reputation over the years has earned us the trust and respect of clients, industry peers, and government agencies. Moreover, clients rely on our broad knowledge of the law and our keen insights into their business concerns and personal interests. Our lawyers' strong tactical and problem-solving skills -- combined with substantial experience handling a variety of complex, high stakes, matters in a boutique environment -- make us one the nation's most distinctive law firms.

With offices in New York City and Washington, D.C., Caplin & Drysdale's core practice areas include:
For more information, please visit us at
Washington, DC Office:
One Thomas Circle NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
New York, NY Office:
600 Lexington Avenue
21st Floor
New York, NY 10022


This communication does not provide legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship with you or any other reader. If you require legal guidance in any specific situation, you should engage a qualified lawyer for that purpose. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Attorney Advertising
It is possible that under the laws, rules, or regulations of certain jurisdictions, this may be construed as an advertisement or solicitation.
©2021 Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered
All Rights Reserved.

Related Professionals

Related Practice Area(s)