Skip to Main Content

Scott Michel Comments on Border Adjustment Treaty Damage Hindering Tax Enforcement

March 2, 2017, Tax Notes

While the destination-based cash flow tax proposal has triggered a vigorous debate about currency valuation, revenue, and wealth effects, the potential effect on offshore tax enforcement has received less attention.

Scott Michel of Caplin & Drysdale, Chtd. said that any disruption to treaty information exchange would be a big deal. He said that the Swiss bank program is an example of the frustration that can come from information exchange issues. The "fraud and the like" standard for information exchange in the U.S.-Swiss tax treaty is much narrower than the standard in most other tax treaties to which the U.S. is a party, he said.

. . .

Michel said that there were thousands of accounts at issue in the Swiss bank program that would have been difficult for DOJ to obtain information on using treaty requests under the "fraud and the like" standard. "The [Swiss] bank program would have been a completely different animal had the [2009] protocol been ratified," he said. Further, under the standard information exchange provision in that protocol, the amount of information and investigative leads the DOJ would have received would have been an order of magnitude larger than the substantial amount of information it did receive under the Swiss bank program, he said.

"There is a strong case to be made that [the weaker information exchange provision] has hampered U.S. law enforcement . . . in a circumstance where there actually is a treaty in place," Michel said. "One can only imagine if the U.S. starts to take a different view of tax treaties, and information exchange under those treaties, how that might multiply itself around the world."

Michel said that a retreat from the international tax community spurred by anti-globalist sentiment could leave the U.S. without a seat at the table for the discussion of what should happen next.

For the complete article, please visit Tax Notes’ website (subscription required).

Excerpt taken from the article “Border Adjustment Treaty Damage Could Hinder Tax Enforcement” by Nathan J. Richman for Tax Notes.


About Caplin & Drysdale
Celebrating our 55th Anniversary in 2019, Caplin & Drysdale continues to be a leading provider of legal services to corporations, individuals, and nonprofits throughout the United States and around the world. We are also privileged to serve as legal advisors to accounting firms, financial institutions, law firms, and other professional services organizations.

The firm's reputation over the years has earned us the trust and respect of clients, industry peers, and government agencies. Moreover, clients rely on our broad knowledge of the law and our keen insights into their business concerns and personal interests. Our lawyers' strong tactical and problem-solving skills -- combined with substantial experience handling a variety of complex, high stakes, matters in a boutique environment -- make us one the nation's most distinctive law firms.

With offices in New York City and Washington, D.C., Caplin & Drysdale's core practice areas include:
For more information, please visit us at
Washington, DC Office:
One Thomas Circle NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
New York, NY Office:
600 Lexington Avenue
21st Floor
New York, NY 10022


This communication does not provide legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship with you or any other reader. If you require legal guidance in any specific situation, you should engage a qualified lawyer for that purpose. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Attorney Advertising
It is possible that under the laws, rules, or regulations of certain jurisdictions, this may be construed as an advertisement or solicitation.
©2021 Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered
All Rights Reserved.

Related Professionals

Related Practice Area(s)