Skip to Main Content

Scott Michel Comments on High-Profile Foreign Bank Account Decision

October 12, 2017, Tax Notes

With the appeals clock running, the U.S. Justice Department offered little insight October 11 into whether it would seek circuit court review of its loss in a high-profile foreign bank account report decision.

. . .

Scott D. Michel of Caplin [&] Drysdale noted that a troubling occurrence for taxpayers looking to certify non-willfulness is inaction following receipt of professional advice in prior years to disclose. This fits the fact pattern in Bedrosian, though in the context of the streamlined filing compliance procedures.

. . .

The district court in Bedrosian also resolved a motion in limine in the government’s favor, granting a motion to exclude IRS procedures, actions, analysis, and viewpoints made at the administrative level concerning taxpayer willfulness. In reaching its decision, the court examined IRS authority outside the FBAR context.

Michel agreed with the decision in the motion, but argued that it still left open another issue. He noted there were cases where the IRS, in asserting willfulness, alleged that a taxpayer lied in an interview.

“The question is, does the same rule apply if the Justice Department puts on the witness stand . . . to establish willfulness, the examining agent?” Michel asked. “Can you then cross-examine that agent, if that agent, for example, expressed doubts about the taxpayer’s willfulness in the administrative file?” He added, “It was one thing for the taxpayer just to get that in to undermine the government’s case. It might be another issue if the government chooses to put the IRS on the stand.”

To view the full article, please visit Tax Notes' website (subscription required).

Excerpt taken from the article "U.S. DOJ Refuses to Tip Its Hand on Bedrosian Appeal" by Andrew Velarde for Tax Notes.


About Caplin & Drysdale
Celebrating our 55th Anniversary in 2019, Caplin & Drysdale continues to be a leading provider of legal services to corporations, individuals, and nonprofits throughout the United States and around the world. We are also privileged to serve as legal advisors to accounting firms, financial institutions, law firms, and other professional services organizations.

The firm's reputation over the years has earned us the trust and respect of clients, industry peers, and government agencies. Moreover, clients rely on our broad knowledge of the law and our keen insights into their business concerns and personal interests. Our lawyers' strong tactical and problem-solving skills -- combined with substantial experience handling a variety of complex, high stakes, matters in a boutique environment -- make us one the nation's most distinctive law firms.

With offices in New York City and Washington, D.C., Caplin & Drysdale's core practice areas include:
For more information, please visit us at
Washington, DC Office:
One Thomas Circle NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
New York, NY Office:
295 Madison Avenue
12th Floor
New York, NY 10017


This communication does not provide legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship with you or any other reader. If you require legal guidance in any specific situation, you should engage a qualified lawyer for that purpose. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Attorney Advertising
It is possible that under the laws, rules, or regulations of certain jurisdictions, this may be construed as an advertisement or solicitation.
©2021 Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered
All Rights Reserved.

Related Professionals

Related Practice Area(s)